Posted by: Catherine Lugg | June 28, 2013

Reading and misreading Windsor v. United States or the Supreme Court’s DOMA decision.


Responses

  1. […] Christie (*shudder!*) would have interpreted the DOMA decision quite differently, correctly noting that Article 2 of DOMA is still good law–hence there’s no need for federal benefits for those folks residing in hater states […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: